Neutral forced-choice items on Bitcoin-style payment and consensus design. High pole: base capacity for ordinary payments; validation-only nodes are not consensus voters; small blocks do not meaningfully buy decentralization; locked base rules reduce protocol-influence concentration; large-block/BSV technical options judged on mechanics. Low pole: secondary-layer retail defaults; hobby node count as consensus; small blocks as decentralization win; continuous base-rule change as harmless; decline large-block/BSV options. No pejoratives, no popularity priming. Compliance probes included.
Results
Comparable within version 1.6.0.
Archived results from v1.6.0. The questions have since changed in v1.8.3.Back to v1.8.3
Where models land
0 lean high pole · 0 lean low pole · 4 near center · range -0.12 to +0.17